To: | Eric Rosenberg <wd3q@starpower.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and Not as Partof Maryland. |
From: | Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org> |
Date: | Mon, 21 May 2007 22:31:55 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Shucky durn, it's very hard to find some of the maritime provinces for the clean sweep in the ARRL Sweepsteaks contest, and that's a much more highly populated contest that NAQP. 73 de n8xx Hg Eric Rosenberg wrote: > The last time this issue was discussed, I was asked if I could can guarantee > anyone would get on if DC was given multiplier status? > > Needless to day, I can only speak for myself and no one else, so beyond that, > the answer was no, I can't and certainly would not make that sort of > guarantee. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and Not as Part ofMaryland., Eric Rosenberg W3DQ |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and NotasPartofMaryland., Steve Harrison |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and Not as Part ofMaryland., Eric Rosenberg |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and Not as PartofMaryland., Mike Reagan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |