| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question |
| From: | Joe <nss@mwt.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:07:51 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
he he he yeah in ss you got to be 599 just to be heard at all! he he he I guess the 5 could be a different number because of the qrm... Joe WB9SBD The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 11/10/2010 12:51 PM, John Geiger wrote: > How do you know that 599 isn't a real signal report? > > 73s John AA5JG > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:20 PM,<al_lorona@agilent.com> wrote: > >> Do the guys who object to the arbitrary selection of a check year in the SS >> exchange also object to the universal practice of arbitrarily sending '599' >> instead of a *real* signal report? >> >> Al W6LX >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CQ-Contest mailing list >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest >> > _______________________________________________ > CQ-Contest mailing list > CQ-Contest@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest > > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callign in exchange, Joe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question, John Geiger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question, John Geiger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS CW question, David Kozinn, K2DBK |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |