I guess, the common folks are Non assisted stations... Or :-)?
73s, Zik DK8ZZ
Am 31.01.2014 05:37 schrieb "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>:
> Why should I wait 30 seconds to hear an ID? My time is just as valuable
> as the run-station. As you point out, I could make 2 or 3 more Q's in the
> time I'm expected to wait for him to favor his audience with an ID.
>
>
> And who are those "common folks" who should just go away?
>
>
>
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB/K7
>
>
>
>
> 🌵 Sent from Arizona 🌞
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 19:08, N2GC <n2gc@aol.com="mailto:n2gc@aol.com";>>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Marc Domen <on7ss.oo9o@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > And why not put in the rules to id after every contact. Would it bring
> the
>
> > number of QSO's down.
>
> >
>
> > It probably will, but then the odds would be even for all.
>
>
> Id after every contact does level the playing field for everyone in the
> competition. IMHO I think this would be a good rule.
>
>
> The argument that less QSO's would result is not necessarily true.
> Looking at Valery R5GA's record rates website.
>
>
> http://rate.r5ga.com/
>
>
> There are a few well known single ops in the top ten that I'd after every
> contact. In fact a few had the best rate some years in certain contests.
>
>
> 73 Mike N2GC
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> CQ-Contest mailing list
>
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|