CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: Doug Smith W9WI <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:02:59 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 01/31/2014 11:07 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
If you want to maximize your QSOs you should not be just listening to a
single radio waiting for a station to ID.

Doesn't that just make Radio 2 the wasted asset, instead of Radio 1?

I mean, yes, it's better to have a second radio you can sit on non-IDing stations while you run or S&P IDing stations on the first rig.

But you're still wasting the time of the second radio. If the guy you're listening to *did* ID, you could QSY the second radio & find another guy to work. Because he doesn't, you can't.

==
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN  EM66
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>