Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

[john@kk9a.com]

If you want to maximize your QSOs you should not be just listening to a
single radio waiting for a station to ID.  Sprint is a completely
different contest which has a QSY rule.  It is not reasonable to compare
the identification portion of the rules with the WPX contest.

John KK9A

To:     cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject:         Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From:    Doug Smith W9WI <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date:    Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:12:32 -0600

Some people try to COMPETE and WIN. That's why they try to maximize the
number of contacts (aka QSOs).

<snip>

Expecting the S&P operator to waste 30 seconds doing nothing waiting for
the run operator to ID is to suggest the S&P operator's time is not
valuable - that he is not entitled to COMPETE and WIN.

I note the Sprint contests have required ID with every QSO from the
beginning. At least here in the U.S. these contests are recognized as
*the* test of operator ability. Nobody is suggesting this rule be deleted.
IMHO its addition to the WPX is a welcome change.

==
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN  EM66
_________________________

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest