CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates

To: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates
From: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:09:39 -0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The audio of that operation is a legacy to mankind.
Hope Dan makes it available for the rest of us to enjoy/learn.
He shouldn't be worried about others learning from it. Humans cannot beat
him!

73,

Martin LU5DX

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:50 AM, john@kk9a.com <john@kk9a.com> wrote:

> N6MJ/ZF2MJ blew away the top rate and had an incredible score in last
> weekend's CQWW CW contest. He described how he did this in his 3830 post
> and you can watch him on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no8nGGa99cE.
>
> John KK9A
>
>
> To:     Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates
> From:   Roger Parsons via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Reply-to:       Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
> Date:   Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
>
>
> Those high rates simply show well equipped stations with good operators
> >who, by virtue of their >LOCATIONS and the SCORING RULES, are really IN
> the
> >contest.
> >73, Jim K9YC
>
> So if you were to have operated from a good station in an advantageous
> location
> you would have won this last weekend?
>
> RIGHT. Silly me for having one second imagined otherwise...
>
> 73 Roger
> VE3ZI
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>