You're not the only one who feels that way Tony,
I've said for a long time that SO1R and SO2R should be separate classes.
OK, back in my hole,
Ron, KU7Y
Arizona Outlaws Contest Club
Northern California Contest Club
Silver Springs, NV
ku7y@qsl.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> N2TK, Tony
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 3:20 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
>
> For my own selfish reasons I would like to see SO1R and SO2R Unassisted
> separate.
>
> 73,
> N2TK, Tony
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Ed
> Sawyer
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 1:19 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
>
> Ditto the KD4D post.
>
>
>
> Why don't we let the unassisted operators decide whether the concern of
> assisted ops invading our category is worth eliminating it over the
concern?
>
>
>
>
> No reason to merge the 2 categories and then do an overlay. Just leave it
> the way it is and clarify reasonable questions like Braco's question.
>
>
>
> By the way, do to great efforts of the organizations and contest managers,
> doesn't the ARRL and CQ contests represent something like 75%+ of all the
> contest Qs made in a year? Why exactly should this majority follow the
> "rest of the world" minority? Just sayin.
>
>
>
> Ed N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|