CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:09:16 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
SO2R has a very small effect on the number of QSO's made in a contest. The number of 2nd radio QSO's I make in major contests is always less than 10% of the total number of QSO's. The primary advantage of SO2R is finding multipliers, not QSO's.

As a reminder, CQWW has a "Classic" overlay category that is SO1R-only. It's also 24 hours - you pick the 24 hours. Lots of fun.

73,
Steve, N2IC

On 04/05/2016 08:15 PM, Jim Fielder wrote:
Me too!   I think so2r is a huge advantage over so1r.   I bet we would see more 
newbies stay with contesting if they felt they had a fighting chance to win 
with their so1r setup.   They put in a FT effort only to find out someone has 
50%  more Qs than they have.  After all this is a competition so they should be 
in their own class.  Then when they are ready they too can invest in multiple 
towers with stacked beams and so2r.  If it is the goal to increase activity in 
contesting I feel we should not scare away those SO1R operators but rather 
recognize their efforts.

73, Jim
KE0L

On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:20 PM, N2TK, Tony <tony.kaz@verizon.net> wrote:

For my own selfish reasons I would like to see SO1R and SO2R Unassisted
separate.

73,
N2TK, Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ed
Sawyer
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 1:19 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net

Ditto the KD4D post.



Why don't we let the unassisted operators decide whether the concern of
assisted ops invading our category is worth eliminating it over the concern?




No reason to merge the 2 categories and then do an overlay.  Just leave it
the way it is and clarify reasonable questions like Braco's question.



By the way, do to great efforts of the organizations and contest managers,
doesn't the ARRL and CQ contests represent something like 75%+ of all the
contest Qs made in a year?  Why exactly should this majority follow the
"rest of the world" minority?  Just sayin.



Ed  N1UR

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>