CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?
From: Dennis Moore <dennis@mail4life.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:10:50 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Look up KH6JF/MM. It was an FT8 system floating on a raft, no operator in control. Apparently made thousands of QSOs, including me on 20m.

73, Dennis NJ6G

On 12/17/2018 06:20, Hank Greeb wrote:
Thanks for the compliment to my mental capacity.  It's is great to have it acknowledged publicly.

I've only seen FT8 working with an operator clicking and calling stations, or having others call his station after he calls CQ.

But, he, and several othres around SW Michigan say that the new version of FT8 has already been set up as a robot, and can operate with the control operator in another part of the shack doing other things.

Again, I've not used either the original version nor the new version of FT8, so my info is 2nd hand.

However, the day is approaching when all functions of a RTTY, CW, PSK31, FT8, etc. stations can and will be able to be controlled by robots.  At that point we'll have a "Zero Operator", or as another operator prefers "Sysop Control" category in contests.  Whether the people who set up the contest will recognize such an entry, or relegate it to the bit bucket or check log category is yet to be determined.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>