CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RST?

To: w1rm@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RST?
From: JIM STAHL via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: JIM STAHL <jimk8mr@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:05:21 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
As I suggested a while back, “5NN” is now a cut number for “Please Copy “

73  -  Jim  K8MR 


Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 16, 2023, at 7:57 PM, w1rm@comcast.net wrote:
> 
> I've been a ham since 1956 and worked more than my share of contests.  For
> as long as forever, RST was an integral part of the qso and exchange.  In
> days gone by, RST had value, especially the R and T values.  If you had a
> crappy signal, T was a way to alert the op of that.
> 
> 
> 
> But, fast forward to today, when was the last time you got anything but 599?
> If you got 227 how would you react?
> 
> 
> 
> Signal reports are available through RBN for strength, to see if a band is
> open, etc., but if you are single op, unassisted, I'm not sure you can even
> use that.
> 
> 
> 
> So, does RST still have value?  Is it time to retire it?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Pete Chamalian, W1RM
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>