RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Re: new SCC rules

To: dezrat1242@ispwest.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Re: new SCC rules
From: Steve Moore AI9T <sjmmoore@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:04:02 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I'll Think I'll just enter this catagory!!!!

Ad. 3) Single Operator, Assisted (Unlimited): Only one operator is allowed to
perform all of the operating, logging and spotting functions (NO restrictions on
band changes and to use any DX Cluster).

Work what I want, when I want!!!!

Big Bubbles,, No Troubles

Lots of Fun!!

--
73

Steve AI9T

http://www.ai9t.com

QSL via LOTW and EQsL





Bill Turner wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:18:14 +0100, Phil Cooper wrote:
>
> >To me, it will be a problem for them as it will depend on the way RTTY is
> >sent!
> >How about USB as against LSB, FSK against AFSK, and then high tones against
> >low tones!
> >In those combinations, there are enough variants to make it next to
> >impossible to judge who was where.
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> The accepted definition of a RTTY frequency is the frequency of the MARK
> signal as transmitted over the air.  It doesn't matter how it's
> generated.  If someone mistakenly puts down his dial frequency when
> running AFSK, he is simply incorrect.  The contest sponsors should make
> this clear.
>
> --
> Bill, W6WRT
> QSLs via LoTW
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty






_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>