RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station

To: "'Shelby Summerville'" <k4ww@arrl.net>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station
From: "jim" <wb5aaa@windstream.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:38:32 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
For me, the problem is the LIDS    on the DX stations TX  freq..
The US side   NUTS

I like trying to work them on every BAND/MODE..  
Is that not  what it is all abt ?



from the shack of
WB5AAA
73 de JIM
 

-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Shelby Summerville
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 5:17 AM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station

K0IDT wrote: "If you could get everyone to read and abide by the DX Code of 
Conduct it might help  http://dx-code.org/";

As long as DXCC Challenge, DeSoto Cup and the "ego satisfying" attempts to 
stay at the top of the Honor Roll exists, the DX Code of Conduct is not 
applicapable! For the few that "work them and shut up", many, many more try 
and work them on as many bands/modes as possible. I await the day a "rare" 
DXpedition, that has online log availability, and publishes their operating 
style, penalizes duplicate band callers by removing all of their other 
contacts? If one is sure that they are in the online log, I see absolutely 
no reason for another attempt, on the same band. In the case of a new 
entity, "once per band/mode" should be enforced? I also believe that the DX 
has most of the responsibility of "controlling the pileup"?

C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW 


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>