RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Take Two RTTY Exchange

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Take Two RTTY Exchange
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:47:03 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On 1/15/2012 12:52 PM, Ken Alexander wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> I never understood how the decision was made to let hams take their
> calls with them when they move to a different call district.  Was it an
> admission the FCC didn't have resources to administer the re-assigning
> of calls as people moved, or was their a great clamouring from hams to
> be able to do this, for whatever reason?
>
> It's a total mess, especially at times like when you're trying for some
> new grids in California on 6m.  You get a W6 and then find out he lives
> in another state.
>
> 73,
>
> Ken Alexander
> VE3HLS
>
I have a different take on this. Years ago before the Information Age, 
perhaps it made sense to issue calls based on geographic location. Now 
days, it matters little. An amateur FCC license is good anywhere in the 
FCC's jurisdiction.

AS to people moving, yes, I suspect there was some clamor to retain 
calls. I'm a W6 living in California. My suffix is my initials and I'm 
very happy with it. It used to be that if I moved to Arizona I was 
forced to either sign W6WRT/7 or get another call. Now I don't have to. 
To me, that's a good thing.

73, Bill W6WRT

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>