At 06:26 PM 1/14/2012, Kok Chen wrote:
>On Jan 14, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
>
> > The only way I can be _sure_ I have it right is to see it 3 times. If
> > two out of three agree, I probably have it.
>
>
>
>...For those who are fond of sending 599 twice, sending "599 CA 599
>CA" is of course better than "599 599 CA CA" due to the behavior of
>RTTY under Rayleigh fading. Not that I ever advocate sending the
>599 twice, or even worse, pretentiously calling it "RSQ." :-) I'm
>just trying to demonstrate the likely behavior of Baudot decoding
>under HF propagation.
>
>73
>Chen, W7AY
But 599 CA CA CA makes much more sense than 599 CA 599 CA - right?
Jerry W4UK
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|