| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] RX366 |
| From: | Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 May 2013 08:53:53 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
OK... Shoot. No offense... but I was banking on what John Henry said. ;-) I am forever picking the wrong candidate... ;-) Thanks for the clarification, OM. ------------------------ K8JHR --------------------------- On 5/20/2013 5:30 AM, Barry N1EU wrote: Sorry James, but the degradation in general coverage is more than "very little" and "barely discernible", per my previously posted test results. ___________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] RX366, John Henry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Rsoifer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Barry N1EU |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] RX366, John Rippey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |