Re: Topband: FT8 qrm

[Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>]

My scenario had the CW man on the frequency FIRST.

On 11/29/2017 4:54 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote:
> A typical CW guy will hear FT8 or JT65 as a kinda whiny wobbly intermittent carrier. And will 
> probably think it’s just some neighborhood switching power supply noise. He 
> won’t CQ right on top of it (because he wants to hear a DX respondent) but he will 
> have no problem firing up 500 Hz away.
>
> But the digital guys e.g. FT8 have 2khz wide filters. So there is a fundamental 
> assymetry here.
>
> Tim N3QE
>
>
> Sent from my VAX-11/780
>
> > On Nov 28, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org> wrote:
> >
> > So what's the protocol when a CW man checks a frequency, hears nothing, sends a 
> > couple of QRL? and hears nothing and begins to run stations.  Then sometime 
> > later a guy running an imaginary mode...oops...sorry, FT8 shows up and wants to 
> > park on the CW man's frequency?  Who is to blame?  I'll answer my own question: 
> > the FT8 guy who is QRMing an occupied frequency.
> >
> > Besides the FT8 guys can always resort to JTAlert to QSO via text messaging as 
> > one west African station apparently tried to do with me.
> >
> > Wes  N7WS
> >
> >
> > > On 11/28/2017 10:45 AM, Bryon Paul Veal NØAH wrote:
> > > There were ops all over the FT8 segments, refused to even try and work them and 
> > > some were some pretty rare mults for CQWWCW...gentleman agreements are of the 
> > > past.....sucks
> > >
> > > PAUL. N0aH
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband