Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FT8 qrm

To: "'Wes Stewart'" <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: FT8 qrm
From: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:08:27 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Wes

I agree 100%; different protocol for two different species. I have ears and not 
a USB port! My PC does.

N4IS
JC

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Wes Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:50 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: FT8 qrm

So what's the protocol when a CW man checks a frequency, hears nothing, sends a 
couple of QRL? and hears nothing and begins to run stations.  Then sometime 
later a guy running an imaginary mode...oops...sorry, FT8 shows up and wants to 
park on the CW man's frequency?  Who is to blame?  I'll answer my own question: 
the FT8 guy who is QRMing an occupied frequency.

Besides the FT8 guys can always resort to JTAlert to QSO via text messaging as 
one west African station apparently tried to do with me.

Wes  N7WS


On 11/28/2017 10:45 AM, Bryon Paul Veal NØAH wrote:
> There were ops all over the FT8 segments, refused to even try and work 
> them and some were some pretty rare mults for CQWWCW...gentleman 
> agreements are of the past.....sucks
>
> PAUL. N0aH
>

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>