Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps

To: Towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld vs clamps
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:38:44 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:51:16 -0700, Jim Lux wrote:

>
>And from a electrical code standpoint.. a low-medium voltage feeder at 
>4kV falling on your antenna or tower will probably be held off by the 
>corrosion, or the wrap of tape, or whatever, and the whole thing will be 
>live.

REPLY:

If the above were true, the NEC would mandate exothermic bonding
instead of clamps. They don't. Clamps work. 

A lot of old wives' tales floating around here. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>