Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] More from the M2 antennas quality control file

To: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] More from the M2 antennas quality control file
From: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:53:18 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I have a number of M2 antennas and I have only had one problem.  I called
them and they corrected it immediately by shipping the correct part.  I
have difficulty believing they won't correct a mistake they made.  I did
call them about mistakes in parts supplied with one of my 9 element 6 meter
beams, but it turned out I was misreading the directions and all the parts
were correct.

Chuck W5PR

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:

> On 4/13/15 5:37 AM, Patrick Greenlee wrote:
>
>> I'm not a Yagi guru or an EZNEC modeler. Can someone tell me what 1/16
>> of an inch in element length means in performance parameters in the
>> example below?  I have done mostly wire antennas and 1/16 or 1/8 didn't
>> seem to make much difference.
>>
>>
> this is a 432 MHz antenna with a lot of elements where the elements are
> about a foot long overall.
> 1/16" if it's on both sides, is shortening the element by about 1%
>
> The element lengths are critical to getting low side/back lobe
> performance, although it doesn't change forward gain very much.
>
>
> As you note, on something like a dipole, a change of a few percent doesn't
> change the performance all that much.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>