| To: | <VHFcontesting@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers |
| From: | "Bill Burgess" <ve3cru@rac.ca> |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Aug 2005 13:55:59 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Yes, I agree that multi-op rovers should be classed separately to a single op.
It does not matter if they are using one or more vehicles, as all are working
as a team under one call. We need this to level the playing field. Otherwise,
the single rover doesn't stand a chance of winning at any time.
Go for it.
73,
Bill VE3CRU
Email: ve3cru@rac.ca
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - How about a change in scoringmethod, KY1K |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers, Tree |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - How about a change in scoringmethod, KY1K |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers, Tree |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |