| To: | "'Richard \(Rick\) Karlquist'" <richard@karlquist.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils |
| From: | <john@kk9a.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:07:37 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Can you elaborate on this? John KK9A -----Original Message----- From: Richard (Rick) Karlquist [mailto:richard@karlquist.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 4:55 PM To: Mike & Becca Krzystyniak; john@kk9a.com; towertalk@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils <snip> Any linear loading scheme has the drawback that the effective loading inductance is directly proportional to frequency; exactly what you don't want. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils, David Gilbert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils, john |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40m 4el KLM - replacing linear loading with coils, David Gilbert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |