Thanks for your input Jim B.
Ed McCann
AG6CX
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 28, 2020, at 5:14 PM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/28/2020 2:10 PM, Edward Mccann via TowerTalk wrote:
>> Thanks Jim:
>> But not sure which your “yes” addresses, part 1 or part 2?
>> 1. “If I use the VNA with direct input of ladder line, say nominal 450 ohm
>> Zo, but with measured parameters more near 400 ohms, should I not run OSL
>> calibration with a 400 ohm load prior to running the sweep?”
>
> NO! We are calibrating the analyzer to the measurement plane, which can be
> it's input and output terminals, or it can be a pieces of 50 ohms coax
> attached to one or both ports.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the SARK is a VIA, not a VNA. -- A VIA (Vector
> Impedance anzlyzer) has one terminal, only measures S11. VNA a(Vector Network
> Analyzer) has input and output, can measure all four S-parameters (so it can
> measure the gain/loss of a two-port device).
>
>> 2. “The response below seems to imply that calibration with a 50 ohm load
>> will yield “good results for coax and two-wire line of any impedance?”
>
> That's exactly what I said.
>
> The potential issue with 2-wire line though is that if the analyzer is
> running from a computer, it can unbalance the line, so it should be seriously
> choked and floating from anything grounded.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|