Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage

To: Gary Smith <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage
From: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Reply-to: k2xx@swva.net
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:41:24 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Yes, I was surprised to discover that FedEx's ground rates are, in some 
cases, almost 50% lower than the USPS.

73, Joe

Gary Smith wrote:

>A little sideways on this subject.  Recently, due to UPS's near over-the-top 
>shipping fees, I have been using FedEx with excellent service.  Their (air) 
>express rates are the same as the brown truck folks, but their ground rates 
>are at least 30% cheaper with 5 day delivery guaranteed.  The low buck way to 
>do this, is to go directly to the FedEx shipping center rather than send it 
>off through the store front people.  Seems to me when the send-it-all-anywhere 
>types touch the items, its like adding $7.00-$10.00 to the price of getting it 
>out of town. 
>Another suggestion: as i fly r/c and have had the occasion to ship some rather 
>large packages, I have sent them via Greyhound package express.  Drawback here 
>is you and the guy on the other end must go to the local greyhound depot to 
>ship out and receive.  But their fees are low and the service is surprisingly 
>quick.  Am not sure about this next, want to recall they have a $300.00 max 
>value on items.  Suggest a look-see on that.
>73,
>Gary... wa6fgi
>  
>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>  From: Will Matney 
>  To: Amps@contesting.com 
>  Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 9:51 AM
>  Subject: Re: [Amps] Shipping Damage
>
>
>
>   
>  Hal,
>   
>  Most know I used to build them and what kind so I wont get into that.
>  However, when I did ship with UPS, let's just say I had numerous claims. The
>  claims were hardly never on a light weight package, only the heavy ones. One
>  day, I asked the driver, who was a friend of mine about what was happening.
>  He said that any heavy package was looked down upon by the workers. If it
>  was so heavy, they'd simply drop it on the concrete floor, or off a loading
>  dock. Especially if it was marked fragile or glass. They figured that the
>  sense this happened, and the item was destroyed, the shipper wouldnt want to
>  try it again. That's the very reason everyone started shipping transformers
>  seperate and the tubes wrapped or seperate, not plugged in. The thing is,
>  this costs UPS and arm and a leg in costs. One would think that the foreman
>  over the workers would keep a better eye out on what's going on unless the
>  foreman is in on it? Being that one of their own drivers knew what was going
>  on makes you wonder if the drivers aint doing it too? Last, dont think that
>  the other shippers dont do it, they all do.
>   
>  Best,
>   
>  Will
>   
>   
>  -------Original Message-------
>   
>  From: Harold B. Mandel
>  Date: 02/24/05 09:27:10
>  To: amps@contesting.com
>  Cc: fredh@pakratz.com
>  Subject: [Amps] Shipping Damage
>   
>  There's a ham who's contacted me regarding
>  damages inflicted upon his Alpha 77,
>  (yet another one...), and has asked what
>  people have done when U.P.S. destroys
>  equipment.
>   
>  Perhaps your comments on shipping experiences
>  would help, especially yours, Colin.
>   
>  Thanks!
>   
>  Hal Mandel
>  W4HBM
>  _______________________________________________
>  Amps mailing list
>  Amps@contesting.com
>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>   
>   
>  __________ NOD32 1.999 (20050215) Information __________
>   
>  This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>  http://www.nod32.com
>   
>   
>   
>  _______________________________________________
>  Amps mailing list
>  Amps@contesting.com
>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>  
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>