CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 20:04:15 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
OK, Jim, you're simply in the wrong location and the scoring rules simply suck, 
or you'd have simply won.


Me, I'm still humbled by that performance.




Dit dit




__73, de Hans, K0HB

"Just a Boy and His Radio"™




On Monday, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:34, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>, wrote:
On Thu,11/26/2015 8:13 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:

> Humbling.  That's all.  Humbling!


WRONG. Those high rates simply show well equipped stations with good 

operators who, by virtue of their LOCATIONS and the SCORING RULES, are 

really IN the contest.


73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________

CQ-Contest mailing list

CQ-Contest@contesting.com

http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>