It may not be legal in the USA; but some people are "getting away with it",
like this one: http://www.qrz.com/db/wf9xjd
An ''experimental license" is all you need, apparently....
73,
Erik - K5WW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@arrl.net>
To: "RTTY reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:51 AM
Subject: [RTTY] ROS policeman on 14101
> During the BARTG, I encountered a loud unidentified jammer near
> 14101, who kept sending the RTTY macro, "This frequency is
> reserved for ROS." I worked through the jamming for about 5
> minutes, and then moved.
>
> I had never heard of ROS, so I did a little digging. As best I
> can tell, ROS is a spread-spectrum mode that sounds like this:
> http://www.nonstopsystems.com/radio/sounds/radio-ROS.wav
>
> There certainly was no ROS that I could hear while I was on
> 14101, just the loud RTTY jammer.
>
> Apparently, ROS is not legal in the USA, but there are renegades
> who insist on operating that mode. ROS ops have decided that
> 14101 is "their" frequency. An ARRL/FCC statement regarding the
> illegality of operating ROS in the USA below 220 MHz is here:
> http://www.arrl.org/news/fcc-reaffirms-statement-on-ros
>
> I don't have a solution for this conflict, but be aware that it
> exists, and there at least one vigilante guarding the frequency.
>
>
> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
> Yuma, Arizona
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|