RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] [Bulk] ROS policeman on 14101

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] [Bulk] ROS policeman on 14101
From: "Rick Ruhl" <ricker@w4pcsoftware.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:08:10 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I though 14.100 was for beacons? Silly me ;)


-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Turner
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 10:50 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] [Bulk] ROS policeman on 14101

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On 3/21/2012 4:58 PM, Ron Kolarik wrote:
> It's very dangerous territory above 14.100, HFlinkers claim 14.100.5, 
> Winlink is all over the place with Pactor and now ROS.
> ROS ops have been known to test new software versions during contests 
> to prove how robust their mode is, not just RTTY contests either. 
> Tread lightly, you're dealing with some enormous egos and an over 
> abundance of arrogance with this lot. During WPX I watched a Winmor 
> station come up and crush at least 5 RTTY signals, this was below 
> 14.100 too.....they're everywhere. Sorry hot button thing here, rant 
> over.
>
> Ron
> K0IDT

REPLY:

In my experience those multi-tone modes make very poor jammers. Plain old
RTTY, especially with dual peak filters, is almost completely immune.

Let us hope they never find out.  :-)

73, Bill W6WRT

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4885 - Release Date: 03/21/12

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>