RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure?

To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure?
From: Randy Lake <randyn1kwf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 08:04:17 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I think it is a great idea Bill. Well thought out. If the jammers want to
jam your frequency you move and he gets bored. I think it would work just
fine as long as the DX moves around.
I think that some of the W1AW/x stations should give it a try. I will.

Randy N1KWF


On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net> wrote:

> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:          (may be snipped)
>
> On 2/5/2014 3:36 AM, Steve IK4WMH wrote:
>
>> I fail to understand how you can find a clear frequency in a
>> FT5ZM-like case.
>>
>
> REPLY:
>
> Spread out more. We often jam ourselves into a few kHz, when we have the
> entire RTTY sub band available. As long as you find a clear frequency in
> the sub band, you have every right to use it.
>
> Keep in mind the four main advantages you would be gaining:
>
> 1. No interference from jammers on the DX frequency.
> 2. No interference for non-split lids on the DX frequency. In fact, just
> the opposite: They free up a slot for the calling stations and bother no
> one but other non-split lids.
> 3. No more Kops with their UP UP UP (often with obscenities) and no more
> lids telling the Kops where to go etc, etc.
> 4. You don't need to work split. Simplex is all you need. Even ancient
> rigs with only one VFO can do just fine.
>
> I think it's worth a try.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>



-- 
Randy Lake N1KWF
73 Gunn Rd.
Keene,NH
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>