| To: | RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] O vs. 0 |
| From: | Kok Chen <chen@mac.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:54:12 -0700 |
| List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
On Jul 17, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Ed Muns wrote: > In any case, the human(s) using the log > check software can certainly intervene and accept either 'O' or '0' if they > wish. Can I log N0OB as NO0B and perhaps get away with it? N0OB is an RTTY reflector participant, at least once upon a time. Mac once told me that he gets QSL cards for NO0B. 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] [3830] NAQP RTTY AA5AU Single Op LP, iw1ayd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] O vs. 0, Ed Muns |
| Previous by Thread: | [RTTY] O vs. 0, Ed Muns |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] O vs. 0, Ed Muns |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |