Perhaps this change would be a good time to review the General Rules and see if
some of them should be altered for VHF. It seems that often the issues that
arise are with the general rules not the?VHF Rules and have to do with rules
that mainly make sense in the HF world.
73 Paul AA4ZZ
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth E. Harker <kenharker@kenharker.com>
To: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Cc: VHFcontesting@contesting.com
Sent: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 4:31 pm
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] rules
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:06:03PM -0700, Nate Duehr wrote:
> Tom Staley wrote:
> >
> > The only thing that would make it easier would be if all of the rules for a
> > given contest were in one site or document, not 2 or 3.
>
> Yeah, pretty much the only way to make this all easier is to keep the
> rules to a minimum, and in ONE place.
My understanding is that part of the reforms in contest coverage/promotion
that have already begun (see the February, 2008 QST) within the ARRL Contest
Branch will be to do just that. The rules were originally split into three
parts (General, HF/VHF, contest-specific) mainly to save page space in QST,
and there's no reason to do that in the web presentation of the rules. I
think it will be real soon now that the Contest Branch web site will start
displaying the rules for a contest in their entirety in one document.
--
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
http://webmail.aol.com
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|